JOGNN

The editors of JOGNN are pleased to announce the launch of a new, limited access collection: Best of JOGNN, 2026. Chosen by Editor in Chief, Dr. Joyce Edmonds, these articles represent the significant, clinically relevant, evidence-based work that has been the signature of for more than 55 years. The articles are freely available for a limited time, and we invite you to read and enjoy! Visit https://www.jognn.org to learn more.

You asked and we listened! AWHONN members now have the option to order print subscriptions of JOGNN and/or Nursing for Women’s Health at a special member rate. Click here to learn more:https://awhonn.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Member-Print-Order-Form_AWHONN.pdf

Menopause may alter biological aging, but current biomarkers do not yet provide clinically actionable estimates for individual women.

Read more at: https://www.jognn.org/article/S0884-2175(26)00183-8/fulltext

Shifts in U.S. vaccine policy since 2025 have disrupted long-standing scientific processes, created fragmented guidance, and increased vaccine hesitancy.

Read more at:

Fractured Guidance in Recent U.S. Vaccine Policy and Implications for Nurses Shifts in U.S. vaccine policy since 2025 have disrupted long-standing scientific processes, created fragmented guidance, and increased vaccine hesitancy.

Learn more about becoming a reviewer for JOGNN!

The author describes the importance of data visualization in research communication.

Read more at:

Principles and Best Practices for Data Visualization in Nursing Research The author describes the importance of data visualization in research communication.

JOGNN Associate Editor Cheryl Beck describes various approaches for the synthesis of qualitative research.

Read more at:

One Size Does Not Fit All in Qualitative Research Synthesis The Associate Editor describes various approaches for the synthesis of qualitative research.

Health care professionals play a critical role in shaping decision-making on the use of donor human milk.

Read more at: https://www.jognn.org/article/S0884-2175(26)00181-4/fulltext

The authors describe the most common causes of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results and use clinical vignettes to highlight common presentations, significance, and management considerations.

Read more at:

Interpreting False-Positive or Atypical Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Results The authors describe the most common causes of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results and use clinical vignettes to highlight common presentations, significance, and management considerations.